System compromise is not automatically success.
Compromise of a server, database, privileged account, application, or individual component matters only if it enables Unauthorized Reconstruction.
Open Independent Scrutiny
$5,000Independent Security Evaluation
SENDĀTRIX invites qualified security professionals to independently examine whether C Chains™ can continue protecting Protected Information after administrative compromise.
Can Protected Information remain protected after Administrative Authority has been obtained?
$5,000Published award
4Adversarial evaluation phases
1Defining success criterion
The Architectural Proposition
Administrative Authority is not Reconstruction Authority.
Traditional architectures frequently allow the authority used to administer systems to become practical authority to recover sensitive information. Structural Protection deliberately separates those responsibilities.
Compromise of one trusted component should not automatically permit Unauthorized Reconstruction.
C Chains™ implements this principle through independently controlled protection, coordination, and protected-information components.
Official Technical Publication
A defined methodology—not a marketing claim.
SDX-TP-002 establishes the architectural proposition, evaluator access, evidence requirements, success criteria, award conditions, and responsible-disclosure process.
SDX-TP-002 · Version 1.1 · August 2026
$5,000 Independent Security Evaluation
Evaluating the Structural Protection Model: Official Evaluation Methodology, Award Conditions, and Evidence Requirements.
What Is Being Evaluated
One specific architectural outcome.
The evaluation is not a generic software certification. The defining question is whether Protected Information can be reconstructed outside the authorization model established by the Structural Protection Model.
Methodology remains open.
Evaluators may use architectural analysis, penetration testing, PostgreSQL forensics, reverse engineering, source review, memory analysis, backups, and multi-stage attack chains.
Evidence must be reproducible.
Findings must include sufficient technical detail, supporting artifacts, and repeatable steps for independent verification.
Evaluation Framework
Increasing access. One unchanged test.
Each phase increases the evaluator's authority and visibility. The success criterion remains the same: demonstrate Unauthorized Reconstruction of Protected Information.
Storage Attack
Examine protected database content and metadata without codesets, administrative secrets, or operational-system access.
DBA Attack
Use full database and administrative privileges, including PostgreSQL artifacts, while lacking Reconstruction Authority.
Module Compromise
Compromise SPA, SPB, or SPC independently and determine whether one component can reconstruct complete information.
Insider Scenario
Use valid credentials and legitimate application access while attempting to exceed the authorized operational scope.
Evidence and Success
Evidence decides the outcome.
A valid submission must demonstrate the methodology, preserve evidence integrity, support independent reproduction, and show that the reported outcome occurred under the published conditions.
Evidence may include
- Technical methodology and complete sequence of actions
- SQL statements, scripts, utilities, or source changes
- Screenshots, recordings, packet captures, and logs
- PostgreSQL, memory, backup, or forensic artifacts
- Reconstructed Protected Information and reproducible results
The defining success criterion
- Unauthorized Reconstruction is demonstrated
- The published authorization model was not satisfied
- The method consistently produces the reported result
- The finding survives independent review or observation
$5,000
The Evaluation Award
SENDĀTRIX will award $5,000 USD when an evaluator demonstrates Unauthorized Reconstruction under the published conditions, provides sufficient evidence, and the result is independently verified.
Responsible Disclosure
Rigorous scrutiny. Fair verification.
Evaluators who believe they have demonstrated Unauthorized Reconstruction are requested to provide sufficient technical information to permit independent verification before public disclosure.
Why verification matters
Verification ensures that findings are accurately understood, reproducible, fairly represented, and evaluated under the agreed conditions.
Recognition of valid findings
SENDĀTRIX is committed to acknowledging successful evaluators and incorporating valid findings into future implementation and publication revisions where appropriate.
Independent Examination Invited
Extraordinary architectural claims deserve evidence.
Examine the implementation. Challenge its assumptions. Document the methodology. Let reproducible technical evidence determine whether the Structural Protection Model withstands scrutiny.