SENDĀTRIX
Patented Data Protection — C Chains
Unmatched in the Market
At SENDĀTRIX, our patented C Chains™ technology sets a new standard for data breach prevention. While related solutions exist, none match our tri-module fragmentation, dynamic codesets, and restoral-only keys for true "unhackable" protection.
Backed by U.S. Patent 9,405,927, C Chains uses a unique tri-module system to fragment data, validate transactions with rolling codesets, and enable controlled recovery—eliminating insider threats and ensuring compliance without system overhauls.
Research shows no direct competitors replicate this. Instead, alternatives fall into broader categories like encryption tools or blockchain privacy, which lack our integrated, database-focused design.
| Technology | Description | Key Differences from C Chains |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) e.g., Thales payShield | Secure key management for transactions and encryption. | Focuses on hardware-based keys; no data fragmentation or tri-module separation—vulnerable to insider access. |
| Blockchain Privacy (e.g., Secret Network with TEEs) | Encrypts on-chain data using trusted execution environments. | Blockchain-specific; public ledger risks and no restoral-only keys—slower for enterprise databases. |
| Cross-Chain Bridges (e.g., Chainlink CCIP) | Secure asset transfers across blockchains with validators. | Interoperability-focused; introduces bridge vulnerabilities (e.g., hacks)—not for general breach prevention. |
| Secret Sharing Schemes (e.g., Shamir's) | Splits data into shares requiring a threshold to reconstruct. | Algorithmic, not module-based; lacks codeset validation and real-time insider blocking. |
| XDR Platforms (e.g., Heimdal XDR) | AI-driven threat detection across networks. | Reactive monitoring; no proactive fragmentation—detects breaches but doesn't prevent them by design. |
Join the $5,000 Unanswered Breach Challenge or explore how C Chains outperforms the rest.